Supreme Court Blocks DOJ Bid to Set Aside 20,000 California Ballots
The Justice Department sought to segregate ballots it alleges belong to non-citizens; lower courts sided with California, and the high court's one-sentence order let that stand.
The US Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to force California election officials to segregate and not count ballots that the Justice Department claims belong to non-citizens, according to the facts at hand.
The Justice Department's request concerned 20,000 ballots in California. The administration asked the Supreme Court earlier on Monday to order officials to set aside mail ballots from 20,000 people it alleges are noncitizens, according to CBS News. The department filed an emergency petition hours before the ruling, according to the Washington Examiner.
Lower courts had sided with California officials, who argued the federal government was seeking to interfere in state elections, according to The Guardian. The Supreme Court ruled on Monday, one day before the midterm elections, according to the Washington Examiner; The Hill reports the one-sentence order contained no explanation and had no noted dissents.
The administration alleges that about 20,000 noncitizens may be registered to vote in California, an assertion disputed by local officials, according to NBC News. California and immigration rights groups question the veracity of the administration's list, according to The Hill, and the Washington Examiner described the ruling as a major setback to the Justice Department.
Original reporting
The Hill
Supreme Court rejects Trump administration’s bid to set aside 20K California ballots
The Supreme Court on Monday quickly rejected the Trump administration’s effort to force California officials to set aside 20,000 ballots it claims belong to likely noncitizens and must be investigated. The court’s one-sentence order contained no explanation and had no noted dissents. California and immigration rights groups question the veracity of the administration’s list and…
Read the original →CBS News
Supreme Court rejects Trump's request in California mail ballots dispute
Earlier Monday, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to order California election officials to set aside mail ballots from 20,000 people it alleges are noncitizens.
Read the original →NBC News
Supreme Court quickly rejects Trump effort to target alleged noncitizen voters in California
The Trump administration alleges that about 20,000 noncitizens may be registered to vote in California, an assertion disputed by the local officials.
Read the original →The Guardian
Facts this version was allowed to use
- The US Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to force California election officials to segregate and not count ballots that the Justice Department claims belong to non-citizens.
- The Justice Department's request concerned 20,000 ballots in California.
- The Supreme Court ruled on Monday.
- The Justice Department ordered California to segregate and not count the ballots, according to The Guardian.
- Lower courts had sided with California officials, who argued the federal government was seeking to interfere in state elections, according to The Guardian.
- The court's one-sentence order contained no explanation and had no noted dissents, according to The Hill.
- The Supreme Court's order was one sentence long, according to The Hill.
- California and immigration rights groups question the veracity of the administration's list, according to The Hill.
- The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court earlier on Monday to order California election officials to set aside mail ballots from 20,000 people it alleges are noncitizens, according to CBS News.
- The Trump administration alleges that about 20,000 noncitizens may be registered to vote in California, an assertion disputed by local officials, according to NBC News.
- The Justice Department filed an emergency petition to the Supreme Court hours before the ruling, according to the Washington Examiner.
- The Supreme Court's ruling came one day before the midterm elections, according to the Washington Examiner.
- The Washington Examiner described the ruling as a major setback to the Justice Department.
Loading comments…
The daily briefing
The day's ten most-covered stories through the lens, every morning, each linked to its original reporting.
Reader comments
Written by readers: not by Lens, its AI or the outlets it credits. Comments are screened before they show. Community rules
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet.